Some toxicity studies of warfarin (0.02% hydroxy coumarin) were carried
against the albino norway rat, Rattus norvegicus and house mouse Mus muscufus.
The gained results were concluded as follows:
A—The Norway rat Hatters norvegricus:
The warfarin bait consumption for each non choice and choice feeding test
was 8.? gr and 4.5 gr for one day. The albino norway rat males were more palatabil
(319%) to warfarin bait than females (31.9%). Warfarin gave 83.3% and 50%
mortality for non choice and choice test. The average time to death was nearly equal
for the obliged and free feeding test which was 5.7 day and 6 days for the albino
norway rat. The reduction of rat body weight who objected to the warfarin bait was —
5.43 gm and 0.7 gm.
For both tests non choice and choice feeding respectively:
B-The house mouse Mus muscufus
The house mouse males and females consumed 2.6 and 2.5
gmi'dayfrndividual and 1.8 and 1.9 gm/day'tindividual for warfarin bait under non choice
and choice feeding system respectively. The palatabitity of house mouse was 45.1%.
The warfarin bait gave 83.4% and 50% for non choice and choice feeding test. The
results cleared that the body weight reduction it was ~2.6 gr and “2.5 gr. for both non
choice and choice feeding system. The general average of time to death in both
obliged and free tests were respectively 1.7 and 8.0 days.
Keshta,, T. (2006). EFFICIENCY OF WARFARIN AGAINST CERTAIN ALBINO RODENTS UNDER LABORATORY CONDITIONS. Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 31(2), 1015-1021. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2006.235164
MLA
T M. Keshta,. "EFFICIENCY OF WARFARIN AGAINST CERTAIN ALBINO RODENTS UNDER LABORATORY CONDITIONS", Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 31, 2, 2006, 1015-1021. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2006.235164
HARVARD
Keshta,, T. (2006). 'EFFICIENCY OF WARFARIN AGAINST CERTAIN ALBINO RODENTS UNDER LABORATORY CONDITIONS', Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 31(2), pp. 1015-1021. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2006.235164
VANCOUVER
Keshta,, T. EFFICIENCY OF WARFARIN AGAINST CERTAIN ALBINO RODENTS UNDER LABORATORY CONDITIONS. Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 2006; 31(2): 1015-1021. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2006.235164