EFFICACY OF THE PREDATORY MITE Neocunaxoides anderi BAKER AND HOFF. (ACTINEDJDA: CUNAXIDAE) PREYING DIFFERENT ANIMAL NOURISHMENT UNDER DIFFERENT TEMPERATURE.
Feeding capacity and life span of Neocunaxoides anderi when reared at 26 !1°C and 70% ± 5 R.H and 30 ±1°Cand 75% ± 5 R.H. on eggs of Agrotis ip < /em>silon (Ashmed), Phythorimaea opercullela (Zeller) and Meloidogyne javanica (Treub) Chitwood were studied.
Female feeding capacity of N. anderi when feed on P.opercullela was 434.8 ± 16.1 with daily rate 8.8 eggs/female and 365.5 ± 25 with daily rate 12.6 eggs/female at 26 ±1°C and 30 ±1°C respectively.
Shorter life span of female N. anderi was observed when reared on egg masses of nematodes; it was 55.2 ± 3.2 and 27.9 ± 2.2 at 26 ±1°C and 30 ±1°C respectively than the other preys.
Sholla,, S., Hafez, S., EI-Naggar, M., & Abdel-megeed, A. (2006). EFFICACY OF THE PREDATORY MITE Neocunaxoides anderi BAKER AND HOFF. (ACTINEDJDA: CUNAXIDAE) PREYING DIFFERENT ANIMAL NOURISHMENT UNDER DIFFERENT TEMPERATURE.. Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 31(8), 5435-5444. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2006.235238
MLA
Salwa M. E. Sholla,; S. M. Hafez; M. E. E. EI-Naggar; A. A. Abdel-megeed. "EFFICACY OF THE PREDATORY MITE Neocunaxoides anderi BAKER AND HOFF. (ACTINEDJDA: CUNAXIDAE) PREYING DIFFERENT ANIMAL NOURISHMENT UNDER DIFFERENT TEMPERATURE.", Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 31, 8, 2006, 5435-5444. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2006.235238
HARVARD
Sholla,, S., Hafez, S., EI-Naggar, M., Abdel-megeed, A. (2006). 'EFFICACY OF THE PREDATORY MITE Neocunaxoides anderi BAKER AND HOFF. (ACTINEDJDA: CUNAXIDAE) PREYING DIFFERENT ANIMAL NOURISHMENT UNDER DIFFERENT TEMPERATURE.', Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 31(8), pp. 5435-5444. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2006.235238
VANCOUVER
Sholla,, S., Hafez, S., EI-Naggar, M., Abdel-megeed, A. EFFICACY OF THE PREDATORY MITE Neocunaxoides anderi BAKER AND HOFF. (ACTINEDJDA: CUNAXIDAE) PREYING DIFFERENT ANIMAL NOURISHMENT UNDER DIFFERENT TEMPERATURE.. Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 2006; 31(8): 5435-5444. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2006.235238