Mortada,, M. (2006). FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF METHOMYL AS MOLLUSCICID AGAINST Monacha cartusiana UNDER LABORATORY AND FIELD CONDITIONS.. Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 31(12), 8027-8033. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2006.235382
M. M. Mortada,. "FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF METHOMYL AS MOLLUSCICID AGAINST Monacha cartusiana UNDER LABORATORY AND FIELD CONDITIONS.". Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 31, 12, 2006, 8027-8033. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2006.235382
Mortada,, M. (2006). 'FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF METHOMYL AS MOLLUSCICID AGAINST Monacha cartusiana UNDER LABORATORY AND FIELD CONDITIONS.', Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 31(12), pp. 8027-8033. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2006.235382
Mortada,, M. FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF METHOMYL AS MOLLUSCICID AGAINST Monacha cartusiana UNDER LABORATORY AND FIELD CONDITIONS.. Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 2006; 31(12): 8027-8033. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2006.235382
FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF METHOMYL AS MOLLUSCICID AGAINST Monacha cartusiana UNDER LABORATORY AND FIELD CONDITIONS.
Plant Protection institute Res Agric., Res. Center Dokkl, Giza, Egypt.
Abstract
Methomyl was formulated as granular formulation using Dyatomite (D) and
Ca2 C03 (VP) as a carrier to 5, 10, 15 and 20% (wlw ai) against Monacha
ceitusiana on moist sod under laboratory and field conditions.
Gastrotox 5 % pellets was tested for companson and as recommended moHuscicide.
Data revealed that Mettiom2yl (GYP) 20 and 15 % were the most effective,
LCo values (9.75 end 11.2 gm I m) foaowed by Gastrotox, Methomyl (GYP) 10 %
and Methomyl (GYP) 5 %, LCo values (2.28, 12.17 and 1689 gm I m2. While
Methomyl (GD) (5, 10, 15 and 20 %) were the lowest treatments, LC5C (25, 27.95.
32.72 and 38.58 gm I ni2) respectively, under laboratory conditions.
Field trials showed that Gastrotox 5 % and Methomyl (GPY) 20 % were the
most effective of the tested compounds against M. ceitusiana. Reduction percenta9es
were (65.93 , 94.97 and 98.13) % and (82.96, 92.14 and 96.28 ) % for the rate of (2,
4 and 6 gm / m2) and (15, 20 and 25 gin I ni2) respectively, followed by Mettiomyl
(GPY) 15 % (75.04, 87.45 and 91.14) % reduction, Wl’le Methomyl (GPY) 10 % was
the lowest one (58.89, 6905 and 8540) %reduction.
Top