Home Articles List Article Information
Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Kassem,, S., Yousef, A. (2004). EFFICACY OF CERTAIN BIO AND CHEMICAL INSECTICIDES AGAINST SUGAR BEET FLY AND SUGAR BEET TORTOISE BEETLE AND ASSOCIATED PREDATORS ON SUGAR BEET PLANTS IN KAFR EL-SHEIKH REGION. Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 29(5), 2833-2838. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2004.239715
S. A. Kassem,; Asmhan E. Yousef. "EFFICACY OF CERTAIN BIO AND CHEMICAL INSECTICIDES AGAINST SUGAR BEET FLY AND SUGAR BEET TORTOISE BEETLE AND ASSOCIATED PREDATORS ON SUGAR BEET PLANTS IN KAFR EL-SHEIKH REGION". Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 29, 5, 2004, 2833-2838. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2004.239715
Kassem,, S., Yousef, A. (2004). 'EFFICACY OF CERTAIN BIO AND CHEMICAL INSECTICIDES AGAINST SUGAR BEET FLY AND SUGAR BEET TORTOISE BEETLE AND ASSOCIATED PREDATORS ON SUGAR BEET PLANTS IN KAFR EL-SHEIKH REGION', Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 29(5), pp. 2833-2838. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2004.239715
Kassem,, S., Yousef, A. EFFICACY OF CERTAIN BIO AND CHEMICAL INSECTICIDES AGAINST SUGAR BEET FLY AND SUGAR BEET TORTOISE BEETLE AND ASSOCIATED PREDATORS ON SUGAR BEET PLANTS IN KAFR EL-SHEIKH REGION. Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 2004; 29(5): 2833-2838. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2004.239715

EFFICACY OF CERTAIN BIO AND CHEMICAL INSECTICIDES AGAINST SUGAR BEET FLY AND SUGAR BEET TORTOISE BEETLE AND ASSOCIATED PREDATORS ON SUGAR BEET PLANTS IN KAFR EL-SHEIKH REGION

Article 1, Volume 29, Issue 5, May 2004, Page 2833-2838  XML PDF (415.06 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jppp.2004.239715
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
S. A. Kassem,1; Asmhan E. Yousef2
1Plant Protect. Res. Insl Sakha Agrlc. Sta. Agric. Res. Center
2Economic Entomol. Dept. Fac. of Agric. Kafr EI·Sheikh, Tanta Univ.
Abstract
Initial and residual effect of four fungal insecticides i.e. Bio-sect, Bio-cansa,
Bic-far and Bio-lIy and seven chemical insecticides, i.e. Aldara, Quick, Marshal,
Mosblane, Admire, Admiral and Necestar were Investigated against larvae of sugar
beet fly Pegomia. mixta (ViiI.) and sugar beet tortoise beetle, Cassida yillala (ViiI.)
and their associated predators, rove beetle, PaedefU$ alfierii. Koch and lacewing,
Chrysoperla carena, Schn.
In case of controlling P. mixta, the initial activity of Aktara was higher than
tile other tested compounds. While, the initlal toxicities of Bio-cansa and Bio-sect
were the least. Residual activities of the tested Insecticides showed that Aktara,
Quick, Marshal and Mosbalane were the most potent compounds, while Necestar and
Blo-fly were less active.
In case of C. Yillala, the Initial activity of Bia-sect was higher than the other
tested compounds. While, the Initial toxidties of Admire and Admiral were the least.
Residual action activities of the tested insecticides showed that Mosblane. Aktara and
Marshal were the most potent compounds, while fungal compounds Bia-sect and 8io-
fly were Jess active. On the other hand, the juvenile hormone mimic, Admiral was very
poor In this respect.
80th Quick and Mosblane were the most serious application against
predator, P. 8lfierii. On the other hand, Admiral, Admire and Necestar were safe to
the considered predator. Quicle: and Marshal were highly toxlc to lacewings C. camea,
while admiral and Bio-sect were safe to the predator.
Statistics
Article View: 93
PDF Download: 254