• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Nassef,, A. (2003). ROLE OF SOME RELATIVELY NOVEL ALTERNATIVES IN INCREASING INSECT'G~DES TOXICITY AGAINST SOME SUCKING PESTS. Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 28(11), 6913-6920. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2003.246314
A. M. Nassef,. "ROLE OF SOME RELATIVELY NOVEL ALTERNATIVES IN INCREASING INSECT'G~DES TOXICITY AGAINST SOME SUCKING PESTS". Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 28, 11, 2003, 6913-6920. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2003.246314
Nassef,, A. (2003). 'ROLE OF SOME RELATIVELY NOVEL ALTERNATIVES IN INCREASING INSECT'G~DES TOXICITY AGAINST SOME SUCKING PESTS', Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 28(11), pp. 6913-6920. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2003.246314
Nassef,, A. ROLE OF SOME RELATIVELY NOVEL ALTERNATIVES IN INCREASING INSECT'G~DES TOXICITY AGAINST SOME SUCKING PESTS. Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 2003; 28(11): 6913-6920. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2003.246314

ROLE OF SOME RELATIVELY NOVEL ALTERNATIVES IN INCREASING INSECT'G~DES TOXICITY AGAINST SOME SUCKING PESTS

Article 4, Volume 28, Issue 11, November 2003, Page 6913-6920  XML PDF (1.8 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jppp.2003.246314
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
A. M. Nassef,
Plant Protection Institute A.R.C., Egypt
Abstract
LaboratOl)' experiments were carried out to evaluate the bioactivity of certain
traditional insecticides (i.e. profenofo$, chlorpyrifos-methyl. monocrotophos and
carbosuifan) against certain sucklng pests. The tested alternativE' were also
evaluated when combined in mixtures with conventional insecticides at1: 10 ratio
based on the LC~'s and LC~'s value Profenofos showed the highest toxicity against
adults of whiteny, B. labacl (Genn.) and two-sponed spider mite, T. urticae (Kochl)
(LC~'s 52 & 8 ppm and L~ 150 & 25 respectively). wherever carbosulfan showed
the highest toxicity against aphids (LC~ 75 ppm and LC~ 160 ppm).
Chloropyrifos-methyl showed moderate toxicity against aphids and mites
wherever monocrotofos showed the least. For the joint action pesticides/alternatives
at 1: 10 • the tested mineral oil Kz. and vegetative oil (black cumin) improved the
toxicity of all tested pesticides against aphids and mites. It was obvious that non of
the tested altematives (i.e. mineral oil Kz. natural oil black cumin or liquid detergents)
showed synergistic action to profenofos, monocrotophos. and carbosulfan against
adults of Bemisia labaci (Genn.). meanwhile. chlorpyrifos-methyl mixtures with Kz oil
and vegetative oil black cumin induced a high increase in toxicity 87.6% and 86.5%.
also the mixtures of chlorpyrtfos-methyl with nastabon increase the toxicity with 28%
and 7.96% for LC~ and L~ values, respectively.
Statistics
Article View: 70
PDF Download: 242
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.