• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Somaa, H., El-Ghobary, A. (2015). INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT COTTON VARIETIES AND GENOTYPES ON THE INFESTATION BY THE SPINY BOLLWORM Earias insulana (BOISD.)AT KAFR EL-SHEIKH GOVERNORATE. Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 6(1), 19-27. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2015.53050
H. M.H. Somaa; Asmaa M.A. El-Ghobary. "INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT COTTON VARIETIES AND GENOTYPES ON THE INFESTATION BY THE SPINY BOLLWORM Earias insulana (BOISD.)AT KAFR EL-SHEIKH GOVERNORATE". Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 6, 1, 2015, 19-27. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2015.53050
Somaa, H., El-Ghobary, A. (2015). 'INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT COTTON VARIETIES AND GENOTYPES ON THE INFESTATION BY THE SPINY BOLLWORM Earias insulana (BOISD.)AT KAFR EL-SHEIKH GOVERNORATE', Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 6(1), pp. 19-27. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2015.53050
Somaa, H., El-Ghobary, A. INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT COTTON VARIETIES AND GENOTYPES ON THE INFESTATION BY THE SPINY BOLLWORM Earias insulana (BOISD.)AT KAFR EL-SHEIKH GOVERNORATE. Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 2015; 6(1): 19-27. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2015.53050

INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT COTTON VARIETIES AND GENOTYPES ON THE INFESTATION BY THE SPINY BOLLWORM Earias insulana (BOISD.)AT KAFR EL-SHEIKH GOVERNORATE

Article 3, Volume 6, Issue 1, January 2015, Page 19-27  XML PDF (182.82 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jppp.2015.53050
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
H. M.H. Somaa; Asmaa M.A. El-Ghobary
Plant Protection Research Institute- Agric. Res. Center, Egypt
Abstract
The present work was carried out during two successive seasons (2012 and 2013) at Farm of Sakha Agricultural Research Station, Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt to evaluate the influence of different cotton varieties and genotypes on the infestation by the spiny bollworm Earias insulana (Boisd.) at Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate. Results during the two experiments showed the infestation percentage of SBW to six cotton varieties and genotypes of both seasons were (8.14, 7.64, 7.66, 6.08, 7.16 and 8.36%) for Giza 86, Pima S6 x Giza 77, Giza 92, Giza 94, Giza 86 x 10/229 and Giza 88, respectively. The highest means of infestation % were recorded in the G.88 and G.86 in both seasons, while the lowest means of infestation% were recorded in the G.94 and G.86 x 10/229 in both seasons. The differences among means of infestation % may be due to the differences of gossypol % in wall thickness of green boll. The means of gossypol% in green boll wall were (1.78, 1.32, 1.44 0.91, 1.75 and 1.16%) and the means of wall thickness were (2.77, 2.38, 2.07, 2.82 , 3.04 and 2.94 mm) for above cotton varieties and genotypes during both seasons, respectively. There were highly significant differences among the cotton varieties and genotypes in some characters.
Statistics
Article View: 113
PDF Download: 363
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.