• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Abdalla, M., Hamza, S., Fayzalla, S., Seeda, S. (2013). POST HARVEST CONTROL OF BACTERIAL SOFT ROT PATHOGENS OF ONION BULB IN STORAGE. Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 4(11), 945-957. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2013.87659
M. E Abdalla; S Hamza; S. A. Fayzalla; S. E. E. Seeda. "POST HARVEST CONTROL OF BACTERIAL SOFT ROT PATHOGENS OF ONION BULB IN STORAGE". Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 4, 11, 2013, 945-957. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2013.87659
Abdalla, M., Hamza, S., Fayzalla, S., Seeda, S. (2013). 'POST HARVEST CONTROL OF BACTERIAL SOFT ROT PATHOGENS OF ONION BULB IN STORAGE', Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 4(11), pp. 945-957. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2013.87659
Abdalla, M., Hamza, S., Fayzalla, S., Seeda, S. POST HARVEST CONTROL OF BACTERIAL SOFT ROT PATHOGENS OF ONION BULB IN STORAGE. Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 2013; 4(11): 945-957. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2013.87659

POST HARVEST CONTROL OF BACTERIAL SOFT ROT PATHOGENS OF ONION BULB IN STORAGE

Article 5, Volume 4, Issue 11, November 2013, Page 945-957  XML PDF (565.33 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jppp.2013.87659
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
M. E Abdalla; S Hamza; S. A. Fayzalla; S. E. E. Seeda
Plant Pathology Dept., Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura Univ.
Abstract
General characteristics of bacterial pathogens based on the biochemical and physiological tests indicated that 41 isolates Out of 88 bacterial isolates collected from rotted onion bulbs  were identified as; Erwinia cacticida (2), Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica (5), Erwinia carotovora subsp. betavasculorum (6), Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora (16), Pantoea spp (5) and Burkholderia cepacia (7).  Storage trial for fresh harvest and cured onion bulbs collected from field plots irrigated, withholding irrigation four months before harvest and 4 different levels of fertilizers (N, K) treatments. Assessment of bacterial bulb rot disease incidence (DI%) were carried out every 2 months regular intervals during 10 months of storage for onion bulb samples after external treatments with propionic acid spray (0,025%), Streptomycin sulfate spray (100 ppm) and actinomycetes (Streptomyces coelicolor) dust formulation. Results indicated that highest DI % in check treatment after 10 months of onion bulb storage was 20.68%. Compared with this control treatment; significant reduction in DI% was found in most treatments after all periods of onion bulbs storage. The highly significant reduction in DI% attributed to spray with propionic acid were 2.13%, 1.51%, 1.27%, 0.67% and 0.0%; followed by dust treatment with actinomycetes were 4.32%, 3.71%, 3.23%, 1.86% and 1.50% after 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 months; respectively. However; low significant difference or reduction in DI% was found between irrigation and withholding irrigation treatments. Among fertilizers treatments; N1K1 treatment (150kg N+ 24kg K2O/fed) showed significant reduction in DI% reached to 4.41%, 5.54%, 6.34%  and 7.18% after 2, 4, 6 and 8 months of storage but after 10 months was not significant.
Keywords
Onion; soft rot bacteria; propionic acid; actinomycetes; storage; post-harvest control
Statistics
Article View: 314
PDF Download: 671
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.