• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Hassan, K. (2014). FEEDING CAPACITY AND HOST PREFERENCE OF Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: chrysopidae) ON THREE DIFFERENT INSECT PREY UNDER LABORATORY CONDITIONS.. Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 5(12), 1045-1051. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2014.88025
K. Hassan. "FEEDING CAPACITY AND HOST PREFERENCE OF Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: chrysopidae) ON THREE DIFFERENT INSECT PREY UNDER LABORATORY CONDITIONS.". Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 5, 12, 2014, 1045-1051. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2014.88025
Hassan, K. (2014). 'FEEDING CAPACITY AND HOST PREFERENCE OF Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: chrysopidae) ON THREE DIFFERENT INSECT PREY UNDER LABORATORY CONDITIONS.', Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 5(12), pp. 1045-1051. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2014.88025
Hassan, K. FEEDING CAPACITY AND HOST PREFERENCE OF Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: chrysopidae) ON THREE DIFFERENT INSECT PREY UNDER LABORATORY CONDITIONS.. Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 2014; 5(12): 1045-1051. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2014.88025

FEEDING CAPACITY AND HOST PREFERENCE OF Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: chrysopidae) ON THREE DIFFERENT INSECT PREY UNDER LABORATORY CONDITIONS.

Article 2, Volume 5, Issue 12, December 2014, Page 1045-1051  XML PDF (391.46 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jppp.2014.88025
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
K. Hassan*
Bollworm Dept ., Plant Protection Research Institute, ARC, Dokki, Giza-Egypt.
Abstract
Laboratory trials of feeding potential of Chrysoperla carnea (Steph.) (No choice) were estimated at (25 ± 2 °C, 65± 5% R. H.). Data revealed that the larval stage of C. carnea (Steph.) fed on egg masses of Corcyra cephalonica (St.) Pectinophora gossypiella (Saund.) and Sitotroga cerealella (Oliv.) consuming all over its 3 larval instars an average of 493.6±50.32, 654.3±32.54and 673.9±31.52 eggs (total consumed) for the three prey species, respectively, with total larval corresponding periods 8.7 ± 0.94, 9.5 ± 0.97 and 9.6 ± 1.17 days.  Statistical analysis of the obtained data obviously cleared that there were significance differences between the mean numbers of consumed C. cephalonica eggs and that of P. gossypiella and S. cerealella; on the other hand there was no significance of C. carnea total larval period when feeding upon each of the three preys.  In addition, host preference (Free Choice) revealed that C. cephalonica was the most preferred host to C. carnea. The predator consumed (13.2 ± 6.01, 77.9 ± 31. 14 and 264.1 ± 68.8 eggs of C. cephalonica for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd predator larval instars, respectively). S. cerealella was the least preferred host, whereas the respective predator larval instars consumed (0.8 ± 1.75, 27.9 ± 24.56 and 63.3 ± 47.2 eggs). Also, numbers of attacked eggs by the predator was recorded. Eggs of Rice moth were the highest attacked with Green Lacewing larvae while eggs of Angoumois grain   moth were the least. This result needs more experimental efforts to earn its advantage in certain predacious performance.  
Keywords
Green lacewing; Chrysoperla carnea; insect preys; host preference; choice; PBW; Pectinophora gossypiella; Rice moth; Corcyra cephalonica; Angoumois grain moth; Sitotroga cerealella
Statistics
Article View: 312
PDF Download: 793
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.