• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
El-Samadisy,, A., Ali, F., Helalia, A., Ali, W. (2008). CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF WILT AND DAMPING-OFF DISEASES OF TOMATO.. Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 33(3), 2273-2284. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2008.217750
A. M. El-Samadisy,; F. A.F. Ali; A. A.R. Helalia; W. M. S. A. Ali. "CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF WILT AND DAMPING-OFF DISEASES OF TOMATO.". Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 33, 3, 2008, 2273-2284. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2008.217750
El-Samadisy,, A., Ali, F., Helalia, A., Ali, W. (2008). 'CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF WILT AND DAMPING-OFF DISEASES OF TOMATO.', Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 33(3), pp. 2273-2284. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2008.217750
El-Samadisy,, A., Ali, F., Helalia, A., Ali, W. CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF WILT AND DAMPING-OFF DISEASES OF TOMATO.. Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 2008; 33(3): 2273-2284. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2008.217750

CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF WILT AND DAMPING-OFF DISEASES OF TOMATO.

Article 5, Volume 33, Issue 3, March 2008, Page 2273-2284  XML PDF (661.45 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jppp.2008.217750
Authors
A. M. El-Samadisy,; F. A.F. Ali; A. A.R. Helalia; W. M. S. A. Ali
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Al-Azhar University, Nasr City, Cairo, Egypt.
Abstract
            Seven fungicides (i.e. tetraconazole, difenoconazole, trifloxystrobin, pyraclostrobin +metiram, metiram, mancozeb and flutolanil ) and  three biological agents (i.e.  Trichoderma harzianum, Trichoderma album and Bacillus subtilis)were evaluated in laboratory against two pathogenic fungi; Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici and Rhizoctonia solani causing wilt disease and damping off of tomato seedlings, respectively. Depend upon EC50 values of the tested fungicides, the in vitro studies showed that the  descending order of fungicidal activity against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici growth was as follows; difenoconazole > tetraconazole > pyraclostrobin + metiram > trifloxystrobin > metiram > mancozeb > flutolanil, while it was  flutolanil > difenoconazole > tetraconazole > mancozeb > pyraclostrobin + metiram >trifloxystrobin > metiram  against Rhizoctonia solani growth. In greenhouse trials, the fungicides were applied at 1500 and 3000 µg a.i./ml water as seed treatment, while biological agents were applied at 1.5 and 3.0 x 106 spore/ml water as soil treatment. The results showed that all fungicides and bioagents treatments significantly reduced diseases incidence and increased emergence and plant stands. Fungicides tested were better to control wilt and damping off than bioagents. Generally the most effective treatments for controlling wilt disease weredifenoconazole, tetraconazole, pyraclostrobin + metiram, followed by trifloxystrobin, metiram, mancozeb, T. harzianum, while the lowest were B. subtilis, T. album and flutolanil as compared with the control treatment, while the most effective fungicide for controlling damping off was flutolanil followed by difenoconazole, tetraconazole, pyraclostrobin + metiram, mancozeb and the lowest was metiram as compared with the control treatment. Trichoderma harzianum was the most effective bioagent tested for controlling damping off, followed by B. subtilis while T. album was the least effective one. Castel rouck cultivar was more resistant to the two diseases under artificial inoculation and greenhouse conditions, whereas Money Maker seemed to be highly susceptible.    
Statistics
Article View: 40
PDF Download: 62
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.