• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Haggag,, E., Nafea, E., Yakoub, W. (2006). CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF HONEYBEE GLUE (PROPOLIS) COLLECTED FROM EGYPT AND SYRIA .. Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 31(9), 6039-6048. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2006.235249
E. E. Haggag,; E. Nafea; Wafa A. Yakoub. "CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF HONEYBEE GLUE (PROPOLIS) COLLECTED FROM EGYPT AND SYRIA .". Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 31, 9, 2006, 6039-6048. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2006.235249
Haggag,, E., Nafea, E., Yakoub, W. (2006). 'CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF HONEYBEE GLUE (PROPOLIS) COLLECTED FROM EGYPT AND SYRIA .', Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 31(9), pp. 6039-6048. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2006.235249
Haggag,, E., Nafea, E., Yakoub, W. CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF HONEYBEE GLUE (PROPOLIS) COLLECTED FROM EGYPT AND SYRIA .. Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 2006; 31(9): 6039-6048. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2006.235249

CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF HONEYBEE GLUE (PROPOLIS) COLLECTED FROM EGYPT AND SYRIA .

Article 3, Volume 31, Issue 9, September 2006, Page 6039-6048  XML PDF (142.57 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jppp.2006.235249
Authors
E. E. Haggag,1; E. Nafea1; Wafa A. Yakoub2
1Plant Protection Res. lnst., Agric. Res. Center ,Dokki, Giza.
2Plant Protection Dept., Damascus University.
Abstract
Some propolis samples collected from different regions of Egypt and Syria
were in vitro investigated for chemical compositions and antibacterial activity against
Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomorras aeruginosa. Results
indicated that the. number of components in the propolis samples extracts were 15
compounds. with different percentages. The HPLC analysis indicated the presence of
the following compounds:— Quercetin, Pinostrobin, chrysin, and Galangin as major
Flavonoids, and Vallinin. Euganol, Cinnamic, Salicylic acid and phenol. Caffeic acid,
Ferulic acid, (3- ohbenzoic, Gallic acid. P- comaric and 3.5 diethoxy benzyl alcohol as
Phenolic components. Results obtained indicated variable differences in percentages
of the compounds in samples collected from both Egypt and Syria. Susceptibility to
several ethanolic extracts of propolis was tested in reference strains of bacteria.
Regarding the susceptibility of the tested bacteria strains, all propolis extracts tested
showed great growth inhibition zone than control, but with variable degree. The main
of inhibition zone of Syrian and Egyptian propolis against the three tested of bacteria
strains were 19.33, 15.06, 15.02. 22.94. 21.39, and 18.73 mm, respectively. Further
more results obtained indicated that gram positive bacteria was more sensitive to
ethanolic propolis extract than gram negative bacteria.
Statistics
Article View: 34
PDF Download: 60
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.