• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Dar, R., Salem, M., Moustafa, H., Hiekel, N. (2015). EVALUATION OF TWO GROUND SPRAYING EQUIPMENTS FOR CONTROLLING SPINY BOLLWORM Earias insulana (BOISD.) IN COTTON FIELD. Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 6(2), 301-312. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2015.53240
Rehab A. A. Dar; M. S. M. Salem; Hemat Z. Moustafa; Nabiela S. A. Hiekel. "EVALUATION OF TWO GROUND SPRAYING EQUIPMENTS FOR CONTROLLING SPINY BOLLWORM Earias insulana (BOISD.) IN COTTON FIELD". Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 6, 2, 2015, 301-312. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2015.53240
Dar, R., Salem, M., Moustafa, H., Hiekel, N. (2015). 'EVALUATION OF TWO GROUND SPRAYING EQUIPMENTS FOR CONTROLLING SPINY BOLLWORM Earias insulana (BOISD.) IN COTTON FIELD', Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 6(2), pp. 301-312. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2015.53240
Dar, R., Salem, M., Moustafa, H., Hiekel, N. EVALUATION OF TWO GROUND SPRAYING EQUIPMENTS FOR CONTROLLING SPINY BOLLWORM Earias insulana (BOISD.) IN COTTON FIELD. Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 2015; 6(2): 301-312. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2015.53240

EVALUATION OF TWO GROUND SPRAYING EQUIPMENTS FOR CONTROLLING SPINY BOLLWORM Earias insulana (BOISD.) IN COTTON FIELD

Article 6, Volume 6, Issue 2, February 2015, Page 301-312  XML PDF (221.01 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jppp.2015.53240
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Rehab A. A. Dar; M. S. M. Salem; Hemat Z. Moustafa; Nabiela S. A. Hiekel
Plant Protection Res.instit.Agric.Res.Center, Dokki, Giza.
Abstract
Three insecticides; Selecron, Trebon and Patron were sprayed using Knapsack motor sprayer Cifarilli (20 L./Fed.) and Economy Micron ULVA (15 L./Fed.) in cotton field infested with the cotton spiny bollworm Earias insulana  (Boisd.) larvae during 2014 cotton season at Qaha district, Qalyoubia Governorate. The spectrum of droplets size ranging between 140-169 microns (VMD) with sufficient number ranging from 14-276 droplets/cm². The productivity of motor sprayer Cifarilli was 12 Fed./day. It was the best equipment, but the lowest productivity was 3.04 Fed./day by using Economy Micron ULVA. Results indicated that Trebon and Selecron insecticides were almost behave to be equitoxic effective in controlling larvae of cotton bollworm on cotton plants than the Patron insecticide with Economy Micron ULVA (15 L./Fed.) followed by Knapsack motor Cifarilli sprayer  (20L./Fed.). The efficiency of the tested insecticides could be descendingly arranged as follows: Trebon, Selecron and Patron. The corresponding general reduction rates were 91.15, 55.99 and 92.51% in case of using Micron ULVA equipment and 91.13, 55.19 and 92.20% in case of using Knapsack motor Cifarilli sprayer, respectively. Data showed that, low volume spraying may be recommended because of reducing the time lost in the process filling the machines of reducing the time lost of the spray solution on the plant leaves and saving the lost spray via run off on the ground.
5L./Fed.).
Keywords
Earias insulana; Selecron – Batron; Trebon; Knapsack motor sprayer Cifarilli (20 L./Fed.) and Economy Micron ULVA (1
Statistics
Article View: 144
PDF Download: 380
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.