• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Abdulhamid, M., Atia, M., Salem, A., El-Deeb, M., Awaad, H. (2011). INHERITANCE OF MAIZE COMMON SMUT RESISTANCE. Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 2(3), 305-319. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2011.86423
M. I. E Abdulhamid; M. M. M. Atia; A. H. Salem; M. A. El-Deeb; H. A. Awaad. "INHERITANCE OF MAIZE COMMON SMUT RESISTANCE". Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 2, 3, 2011, 305-319. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2011.86423
Abdulhamid, M., Atia, M., Salem, A., El-Deeb, M., Awaad, H. (2011). 'INHERITANCE OF MAIZE COMMON SMUT RESISTANCE', Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 2(3), pp. 305-319. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2011.86423
Abdulhamid, M., Atia, M., Salem, A., El-Deeb, M., Awaad, H. INHERITANCE OF MAIZE COMMON SMUT RESISTANCE. Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 2011; 2(3): 305-319. doi: 10.21608/jppp.2011.86423

INHERITANCE OF MAIZE COMMON SMUT RESISTANCE

Article 6, Volume 2, Issue 3, March 2011, Page 305-319  XML PDF (465.25 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jppp.2011.86423
Authors
M. I. E Abdulhamid1; M. M. M. Atia2; A. H. Salem1; M. A. El-Deeb3; H. A. Awaad1
1Agronomy Dept., Fac. Agric., Zagazig Univ., Egypt
2Agric. Bot. and Plant Pathol. Dept., Fac. Agric., Zagazig Univ., Egypt
3Plant Protection Dept., Fac. Agric., Zagazig Univ., Egypt
Abstract
Eight white maize inbreds, namely L 120, L74, L 144, L56, L 82, L 71, L 85 and L 173 and 28 F1 maize crosses derived from a half diallel cross among these white inbreds, in addition to S.C. 10 check hybrid were evaluated for their resistance to the common smut disease and also for their grain yield (ardab/feddan) in two seasons. Artificial infection was applied using Ustilago maydis spore suspension (at 5 x 105 sporidia /ml. which was injected into the ear heads (2 ml per ear head) 4 to 7 days after the silking stage). Also, two sowing dates were applied. The results indicated that there were significant differences among the genotypes, parents, crosses and parent vs. crosses for disease incidence (DI), disease severity (DS), total soluble solids (T.S.S.), percent yield reduction and grain yield (ardab/feddan). The parental inbred lines L3 and L4 and their F1 crosses L3 x L4, L3 x L6, L1 x L3, L2 x L4 and L3 x L5 exhibited the lowest values of DI, DS and percent yield reduction with higher values of T.S.S. and grain yield and classified as more resistant to common smut disease than other lines and therefore considered the promising ones. Disease incidence and DS were lower in early sowing than late one. Variances due to general combining ability (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) was highly significant for all the studied characters under the two sowing dates. The additive gene action was more important than the dominance one in the inheritance of common smut resistance measurements, but the non-additive gene action was adequate in the inheritance of grain yield in both sowing dates. Inbred lines (L1), (L2), (L3) and (L4) significantly exhibited negative GCA effects. Hereby these inbreds were the best general combiners for common smut resistance characters, while the inbred lines (L2), (L3), (L5) and (L6) were the best for grain yield. The single crosses (L1 x L8), (L2 x L3), (L3 x L4), (L4 x L6), (L4 x L8) and (L6 x L8) could be recommended to be used in maize breeding program for resistance to common smut disease and high grain yield.Heritability in narrow sense was high (> 50%) for DI, DS and percent yield reduction; moderate (30-50%) for T.S.S. and low (< 30%) for grain yield. 
Keywords
Corn; common smut; Ustilago maydis; breeding
Statistics
Article View: 66
PDF Download: 128
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.